November 16, 2017

Study: Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion outcomes in cardiac surgery patients

By: Judy Mathias

Editor’s Note

A restrictive blood transfusion strategy (HGB <7.5 g/dL) was equivalent to a liberal strategy (HGB <9.5 g/dL in the OR or ICU and HGB<8.5 g/dL in the non-ICU ward) with regard to mortality and major disability in cardiac surgery patients who had a moderate-to-high risk of death, this study finds.

The primary composite outcome−death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by discharge or postoperative day 28−occurred in 11.4% of patients in the restrictive group and 12.5% in the liberal group.

Mortality was 3.0% and 3.6% in the restrictive group and liberal group, respectively.

These outcomes were achieved with fewer units of blood being transfused−red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of patients in the restrictive group and 72.6% in the liberal group.

The study involved 4,860 patients (2,430 in each group) at 73 sites in 19 countries.



The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear.



Sign Up For OR a.m.
Sign up for the free OR a.m. eLetter to get news like this in your inbox every morning!

Upcoming Webinars
Live chat by BoldChat